Methuselah

More Dependencies

Some dependencies between resources are not limited to just one host. A web cluster with an upstream load balancer can only accept a new cluster node once it has been configured. Puppet supports exported resources for such a case. Cluster membership is declared as such an exported resource for the new cluster node, but instead of applying it there, the master stores it in PuppetDB.

During the next Puppet run on the load balancer, all cluster members, including the new one, are entered into the configuration there and the cluster then has a new, functional member. In the manifest for the load balancer, this is done by a collector that queries PuppetDB on the server for appropriate resources and passes them to the agent in the catalog. The otherwise optional PuppetDB is therefore a mandatory requirement for exported resources.

Roles and Profiles

Dependencies, especially those limited to one host, quickly led to problems in the early days of Puppet. The desire to maintain an overview and not get tangled up in dependencies led to the concept of roles and profiles.

Modules are divided into three levels. The lowest are the component modules, which generically take care of configuring software. They can be obtained to a large extent from Puppet Forge. Component modules only take care of specific software – the Apache module should only take care of the web server and not handle log rotation or firewall configuration, which are done by separate component modules.

At the second level, the implementation layer, individual classes of a module bring together the required component modules. You have to create the corresponding profile module yourself, in which you merge the configuration for log rotation and the firewall configuration for your own web server, for example.

Classes on both levels can use parameters and be configured by Hiera. In the role, which is the top layer, you can only declare profile classes following the strategy. For example, the CMS summarizes the profiles for web server, application and database as a role. Such a class of the role module is also referred to as a business class or role.

This abstraction drastically reduces dependencies between resources that need to be defined, and reported dependency cycles occur far less frequently.

What Puppet Can't Do

Puppet is designed for configuration management, not for managing or updating software. Resources of type package can be fixed to a version of the package, which could change in the course of the time, although it should be avoided if possible. Besides the inevitable problems with package managers, difficulties with downgrades occur with version jumps.

If something like this is allowed to happen, you might find Puppet attempting a downgrade during the next general system update. The clear recommendation is to establish some kind of software management like Spacewalk or Satellite or Foreman/Katello to provide different software states in different versions of the software repositories.

Because Puppet uses an asynchronous approach, it is also not suitable as an orchestration tool (e.g., in contrast to Ansible) to execute tasks simultaneously. One typical example is updates or reconfigurations on cluster nodes, for which Ansible is better suited. However, if you are already using Puppet, it is worth taking a look at Puppet Bolt [8], Puppet's orchestration tool. Bolt works with tasks that can be written in any language and includes Puppet; then, you benefit from the RAL. In this way, the same code can be used across platforms.