On the basis of my own experience, FAI.me triggers two reactions that could hardly be more different. On the one hand, enthusiastic admins have needed a tool like this and had not yet found it. On the other hand, more conventional admins with backgrounds in automation have turned up their noses.

A conflict comes to light that plays an important role in contemporary IT. Does it make more sense to work with operating system images, or should you instead rely on the vendor's installation tools and use automation to make the required adjustments? Although this discussion is undoubtedly still in full sway, many assumptions and fears are based on obsolete knowledge.

Admins are absolutely right when they warn against monster images that cannot be regenerated when you need them. Companies commonly find that a golden master image for the installation of new systems has "grown historically": It works, but nobody in the company knows exactly what it contains. When a new image has to be built, it often involves massive overhead and consumes a huge amount of time.

The same applies to images you can pick up from alternative "black box" sources from the Internet. One thing you do not want in your data center is a pre-owned image with a built-in Bitcoin miner, although this is mostly discovered in the context of container images. However, the same caveat naturally also applies to images of entire operating systems.

By the way, when many admins think of images, they think of bare metal deployments. Because the local variance in this area is much higher than in defined environments such as KVM or VMware, many people in the past believed that monster images were legitimate or even necessary.

Like with a pendulum, a countermovement of tinkerers categorically reject OS images. Instead, its proponents say you should install Linux on your hard disk with AutoYaST, Kickstart, the Debian preseeding method, or whatever your distribution uses as an automatic installation tool. According to this narrative, then, the automation engineer handles the rest of the work.

However, this problem is easy to work around: Continuous integration and continuous delivery/deployment (CI/CD) environments based on Jenkins offer the ability to build OS images completely automatically. Of course, FAI.me is also an approach to circumventing precisely the problem described. If you use FAI.me to build your images, you can understand the process in detail, and if you so desire, you can also run FAI.me in an instance of its own, which then contains local modifications – but in a comprehensible way.

The images built with FAI.me can just as easily be frugal operating system images that simply prepare a host for use with Puppet, Ansible, or some other automation system. By the way, this is more elegant by several orders of magnitude than the automation structures that some administrators build themselves with scripting in Kickstart or AutoYaST or by preseeding.

One thing should be clear by now: Nothing works without operating system images. They are essential in clouds because virtual instances cannot be built and started without them. Installers from distributions are simply not viable alternatives, because the current clouds do not support the PXE boot functionality required in the first place.

In the end, as is often the case, a whole range of gray tones exist, and those admins who find a perfect mix of images on the one hand and automation on the other, will have a pleasing result. FAI.me is a promising and well-proven component in such a context.