IBM Announces Uncertainty Toolkit
IBM has announced the open source release of its Uncertainty Quantification 360 Toolkit (UC360). The toolkit provides a versatile and nuanced way for an AI system to express uncertainty. According to the press release, “AI systems based on deep learning have a reputation for making overconfident predictions, even when they are wrong—with serious consequences at times.”
AI systems often behave quite confidently, but they lack a means for assessing the grounds for that confidence. The result of this blind spot is sometimes disastrous. Self-driving cars, pharmacy bots, and other AI tools are known to occasionally make dangerous mistakes because they have no systematic way of assigning a confidence level for their predictions. The goal of UC360 is to offer a means for AI to express a degree of uncertainty.
IBM also believes that UC360 could reduce the time necessary for discovering new materials and new medications. “By conducting experiments where the uncertainty is greatest, we have reduced the number of experiments in the material discovery process.” In pre-screening tests, drug candidates that receive a high confidence score from the AI system advance to the next stage. As a result, UQ360 “...reduces the time, money, and effort expended for AI-assisted drug discovery without missing potentially life-saving candidates.”
For more information, see the press release at the IBM website.
Related content
- D-Wave Unveils New Quantum Computing Capabilities
- Fujitsu Announces Ethical Toolkit
-
Welcome
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle states that you can know either the velocity or the direction of an electron, but not both at the same time – at least not in a precise way, you can't. The Hess Uncertainty Principle states that you can't know (precisely) both the speed and the direction of computing. I thought of this during my recent trip to Austin, Texas, where I attended Dell World 2014. Dell turned 30 years old this year, and I never would have predicted, with any accuracy, the new direction that Dell has taken. Nor would I have predicted its current velocity. How could I have known both simultaneously? The short answer is that I couldn't. I'm not even sure that Michael Dell could have predicted, as little as five years ago, the speed and the direction of his company today. - Prepare Now for New Cybersecurity Regulations
- Google Announces the Google Cloud HPC Toolkit