« Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Profiling Python Code
pprofile
To get a line-by-line profile of your code, you can use the pprofile tool, for a granular, thread-aware analysis for deterministic or statistical profiling (pure Python). The form of pprofile is:
$ pprofile some_python_executable arg1 ...
After the tool finishes, it prints annotated code of each file involved in the execution.
By default, pprofile profiling is deterministic, which although it slows down the code, produces a very complete profile. You can also use pprofile in a statistical manner, which uses much less time:
$ pprofile --statistic .01 code.py
With the statistic option, you also need to specify the period of time between sampling. In this example, a period of 0.01 seconds was used.
Be careful when using the statistic option because, if the sample time is too long, you can miss a number of computations, and the output will incorrectly record zero percent activity. Conversely, to get a better estimation of the time spent in certain portions of the code, you have to reduce the time between samples to the point of almost deterministic profiling.
The deterministic pprofile sample output in Listing 3 uses the same code as the previous cProfile example. I cut out sections of the output because it is very extensive. One thing I want to point out is the increase in execution time by about a factor of 10 (i.e., it ran 10 times slower than without profiling).
Listing 3: pprofile Output
Command line: md_002.py Total duration: 1662.48s File: md_002.py File duration: 1661.74s (99.96%) Line #| Hits| Time| Time per hit| %|Source code ------+----------+-------------+-------------+-------+----------- 1| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%|# md test code 2| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| 3| 2| 3.50475e-05| 1.75238e-05| 0.00%|import platform 4| 1| 2.19345e-05| 2.19345e-05| 0.00%|from time import clock (call)| 1| 2.67029e-05| 2.67029e-05| 0.00%|# :1009 _handle_fromlist 5| 1| 2.55108e-05| 2.55108e-05| 0.00%|import numpy as np (call)| 1| 0.745732| 0.745732| 0.04%|# :978 _find_and_load 6| 1| 2.57492e-05| 2.57492e-05| 0.00%|from sys import exit (call)| 1| 1.7643e-05| 1.7643e-05| 0.00%|# :1009 _handle_fromlist 7| 1| 7.86781e-06| 7.86781e-06| 0.00%|import time ... 234| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # Compute the potential energy and forces 235| 12525000| 51.0831| 4.07849e-06| 3.07%| for j in range(0, p_num): 236| 12500000| 51.6473| 4.13179e-06| 3.11%| if (i != j): 237| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # Compute RIJ, the displacement vector 238| 49900000| 210.704| 4.22253e-06| 12.67%| for k in range(0, d_num): 239| 37425000| 177.055| 4.73093e-06| 10.65%| rij[k] = pos[k,i] - pos[k,j] 240| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # end for 241| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| 242| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # Compute D and D2, a distance and a truncated distance 243| 12475000| 50.5158| 4.04936e-06| 3.04%| d = 0.0 244| 49900000| 209.465| 4.1977e-06| 12.60%| for k in range(0, d_num): 245| 37425000| 175.823| 4.69801e-06| 10.58%| d = d + rij[k] ** 2 246| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # end for 247| 12475000| 78.9422| 6.32803e-06| 4.75%| d = np.sqrt(d) 248| 12475000| 64.7463| 5.19008e-06| 3.89%| d2 = min(d, np.pi / 2.0) 249| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| 250| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # Attribute half of the total potential energy to particle J 251| 12475000| 84.7846| 6.79636e-06| 5.10%| potential = potential + 0.5 * np.sin(d2) * np.sin(d2) 252| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| 253| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # Add particle J's contribution to the force on particle I. 254| 49900000| 227.88| 4.56674e-06| 13.71%| for k in range(0, d_num): 255| 37425000| 244.374| 6.52971e-06| 14.70%| force[k,i] = force[k,i] - rij[k] * np.sin(2.0 * d2) / d 256| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # end for 257| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # end if 258| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| 259| 0| 0| 0| 0.00%| # end for ...
Line-by-Line Function Profiling
The useful pprofile analyzes your entire code line by line. It can also do deterministic and statistical profiling. If you want to focus on a specific function within your code, line_profiler and kernprof can help. The line_profiler module performs line-by-line profiling of functions, and the kernprof script allows you to run either line_profiler or standard Python profilers such as cProfile.
To have kernprof run line_profiler , enter,
$ kernprof -l script_to_profile.py
which produces a binary file, script_to_profile.py.lprof . To “decode” the data, you can enter the command
$ python3 -m line_profiler script_to_profile.py.lprof > results.txt
and look at the results.txt file.
To get line_profiler to profile only certain functions, put an @profile decorator before the function declaration. The output is the elapsed time for the routine. The percentage of time, which is something I tend to check first, is relative to the total time for the function (be sure to remember that). The example in Listing 4 is output for some example code discussed in the next section.
Listing 4: Profiling a Function
Total time: 0.365088 s File: ./md_002.py Function: update at line 126 Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents ============================================================== 126 @profile 127 def update(d_num, p_num, rmass, dt, pos, vel, acc, force): 128 129 # Update 130 131 # Update positions 132 200 196.0 1.0 0.1 for i in range(0, d_num): 133 75150 29671.0 0.4 8.1 for j in range(0, p_num): 134 75000 117663.0 1.6 32.2 pos[i,j] = pos[i,j] + vel[i,j]*dt + 0.5 * acc[i,j]*dt*dt 135 # end for 136 # end for 137 138 # Update velocities 139 200 99.0 0.5 0.0 for i in range(0, d_num): 140 75150 29909.0 0.4 8.2 for j in range(0, p_num): 141 75000 100783.0 1.3 27.6 vel[i,j] = vel[i,j] + 0.5*dt*( force[i,j] * rmass + acc[i,j] ) 142 # end for 143 # end for 144 145 # Update accelerations. 146 200 95.0 0.5 0.0 for i in range(0, d_num): 147 75150 29236.0 0.4 8.0 for j in range(0, p_num): 148 75000 57404.0 0.8 15.7 acc[i,j] = force[i,j]*rmass 149 # end for 150 # end for 151 152 50 32.0 0.6 0.0 return pos, vel, acc
« Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »