Once you have decided to go for a thin client, you still have to choose which one. We look at five different devices from the wide variety of thin clients on offer.
There is no such thing as the best thin client. Nevertheless, in this article I compare five representative models – why? Because the thin client certainly is the best device for a particular purpose. The intended application determines how practical and inexpensive a certain thin client is.
If the application only uses text-based menus and ASCII art, if you do not need to connect to local peripherals, and if response time is not critical, your needs will certainly be well served with an inexpensive entry-level model. However, if you want to work with multiple monitors or even handle multimedia content to a significant extent, the entry-level choice is not optimal. Additionally, if you need special interfaces, you will have to look for a thin client that is equipped with them.
The choice is quite varied. We picked five fairly universal models, including entry-level devices and their better-equipped competitors (see Table 1).
Table 1
Thin Client Comparison
Manufacturer
Rangee GmbH
IGEL Technology GmbH
Fujitsu
Wyse Technology GmbH
Wyse Technology GmbH
Price
approx. EUR 375
approx. US$ 435
approx. US$ 450
...
Use Express-Checkout link below to read the full article (PDF).
Anyone who has tried to to run graphics-intensive applications using an application-sharing protocol like RDP knows how miserably these technologies fail. But the PCoIP protocol and special hardware means that even heavy-duty workstations can operate remotely.
Anyone who has tried to to run graphics-intensive applications using an application-sharing protocol like RDP knows how miserably these technologies fail. But the PCoIP protocol and special hardware means that even heavy-duty workstations can operate remotely.
The revival of terminal servers during the Covid-19 crisis depended on the IT administrator to enable home office workplaces, with the help of tools like ThinLinc, a Linux remote desktop server.
Red Hat introduces a management system for KVM-based virtualization based on Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization and open source project oVirt. Now, solutions for desktop virtualization can be implemented without using proprietary software.