Lead Image © avian, 123RF.com
Red Hat Storage Server 2.1
Spartan Camp
Software Defined Storage (SDS) is gaining popularity within the IT community. An SDS system is similar to a Storage Area Network (SAN) system, except, rather than operating on specialized, proprietary hardware systems, an SDS uses software to handle the storage on commodity hardware.
This emphasis on commodity hardware – and more transparent software systems – means the customer can avoid the expense and annoyance of the vendor lock-in associated with so many SAN solutions. In 2013, Red Hat introduced an SDS product designed to give users a viable alternative to a SAN: Red Hat Storage Server (RHSS – see Figures 1 and 2) [1].
Figure 1: Red Hat offers a RHSS test drive with VMs that are hosted on Amazon's AWS.
Buy ADMIN Magazine
US / Canada
UK / Australia
Related content
-
Red Hat Storage Server 2.1
If you believe Red Hat’s marketing hype, the company has no less than revolutionized data storage with version 2.1 of its Storage Server. The facts tell a rather different story.
-
GlusterFS Storage Pools
GlusterFS stores data across the network and can be used as a storage back end in cloud environments.
-
Build storage pools with GlusterFS
GlusterFS stores data across the network and can be used as a storage back end in cloud environments. -
Comparing Ceph and GlusterFS
Many shared storage solutions are currently vying for users’ favor; however, Ceph and GlusterFS generate the most press. We compare the two competitors and reveal the strengths and weaknesses of each solution. -
GlusterFS
Sure, you could pay for cloud services, but with GlusterFS, you can take the idle space in your own data center and create a large data warehouse quickly and easily.